On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Erik Moeller<[email protected]> wrote: > > Because the GFDL is only of interest to a minority of > re-users, ...
If this is the Foundation's view, why did it opt to push for (hobbled) dual-licencing going forward, instead of transitioning completely to CC-BY-SA and retaining GFDL only for legacy content? -- Stephen Bain [email protected] _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
