2009/6/18 Stephen Bain <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Erik Moeller<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Because the GFDL is only of interest to a minority of >> re-users, > ... > > If this is the Foundation's view, why did it opt to push for (hobbled) > dual-licencing going forward, instead of transitioning completely to > CC-BY-SA and retaining GFDL only for legacy content?
As I understand it, it was a concession made to the FSF during the negotiations. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
