On 3 March 2010 13:26, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 3 March 2010 12:28, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for your copyfight. There is plenty >>> of reason to exclude this material regardless of the copyright/legal >>> concerns, and plenty of other people hosting it elsewhere. Doubly >>> true where the material is promoted with spammish efforts, like it has >>> been with some of these cryptographic keys. >> >> >> http://enwp.org/WP:09F9 is the previous thinking on this matter. >> >> Summary: memespam is a pain in the backside and interferes with doing >> what we actually do. > > Thank you for reminding me of this, I generalized it a bit to also > cover the TI signing keys. > > The talk page also has some excellent commentary. >
I think we can agree that the keys are not appropriate content for Wikipedia. However, they may be useful elsewhere e.g. in a Wikibook on TI programming. Would the Foundation remove them there? Pete / the wub _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
