Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > The WMF should absolutely duke it out to protect material that ought > to be in Wikipedia in accordance with the educational mission and > community editorial guidelines. It ought not engage in fights outside > of those areas for every instance of possibly suppressed legitimate > speech that occurs on the Internet (even in cases where we all > personally support the efforts). > > Personally I don't have a dog in this fight, but on this point I am bound to note that [[Illegal number]] is essentially solidly referenced and perfectly neutral in its representation of the facts, while being IMO of a sufficient generality to not be susceptible to at least the accusation of being of questionable educational merit.
It doesn't carry any of the numbers themselves -- though [[Illegal prime]] in contrast does show two of the primes in full. Both numbers however benefit from a definite lack of recentistic problem, and nearly certainly aren't being spammed, due to their age. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
