On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Peter Coombe <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 3 March 2010 13:26, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:49 AM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 3 March 2010 12:28, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Wikipedia is not a dumping ground for your copyfight. There is plenty > >>> of reason to exclude this material regardless of the copyright/legal > >>> concerns, and plenty of other people hosting it elsewhere. Doubly > >>> true where the material is promoted with spammish efforts, like it has > >>> been with some of these cryptographic keys. > >> > >> > >> http://enwp.org/WP:09F9 is the previous thinking on this matter. > >> > >> Summary: memespam is a pain in the backside and interferes with doing > >> what we actually do. > > > > Thank you for reminding me of this, I generalized it a bit to also > > cover the TI signing keys. > > > > The talk page also has some excellent commentary. > > > > I think we can agree that the keys are not appropriate content for > Wikipedia. However, they may be useful elsewhere e.g. in a Wikibook on > TI programming. Would the Foundation remove them there? > > Pete / the wub > For reference: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TI-Basic_84_Programming http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TI-Basic_89_Programming http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/TI-Basic_Z80_Programming -Adrignola _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
