On 4 March 2010 19:41, <[email protected]> wrote: > Which means of course that a person could claim copyright to the very > technology underlying Wikipedia, and demand the entire project be taken down. > In fact a different mentally ill person could make this claim every month > and force the project offline. > > That's the world you're advocating? No responsibility on the part of the > office to even make the slightest attempt to verify the claim? > > > W.J. >
Copyright doesn't work like that. However it is already established that there are a number of core areas where the foundation is prepared to get involved in legal fights. Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp. for example. The legal status of mediawiki is another where I expect it would. Some calculator of little note? It would appear not. -- geni _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
