Le 01/03/2011 18:31, Michael Snow a écrit : > On 3/1/2011 12:57 PM, Pronoein wrote: >> If there is such a minority of ethical concerns, it could be one of the >> reasons that volunteers are leaving the boat. > Based on the one survey of former contributors that has been conducted > (see > http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Former_Contributors_Survey_Results), > this doesn't figure highly enough to demonstrate the kind of significant > minority you suggest. Rather, the concerns of those surveyed are > overwhelmingly about how rulebound, overly complex, and unfriendly their > work in the community seemed to be. Perhaps somebody would care to go > back through the full survey responses and see if they can identify > comments that fit the "I was being exploited" line you're pushing here. > I would prefer to hope that as the foundation's community department > works to develop the fundraising and messaging, it will also create and > improve upon initiatives that lead to a better community environment, as > that seems to be the dominant problem.
Thank you for your answer Michael. However: «Note that this survey was aimed at less experienced editors. » I remember for example that many administrators quit during the sexual content controversy because of the decision of Jimbo. Those people were driven by a vision of a certain type of governance and felt betrayed or disappointed. _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
