On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 21:04, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > The first two seem like no-brainers, but what are you thinking of > 'harming the name of GNOME'? Is a clause requiring acceptable levels of > privacy sufficient? Do you have other, concrete concerns here?
I guess the extreme example might be "What do you do if someone comes to you with a HIG compliant, gtk+ using, accessible, i18n translated 'Bomb the New York Subway' game" [hello MI5] There are things you want a reason never to be associated with. _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
