On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 21:04, Jonathan Blandford wrote: > > The first two seem like no-brainers, but what are you thinking of > > 'harming the name of GNOME'? Is a clause requiring acceptable levels of > > privacy sufficient? Do you have other, concrete concerns here? > > I guess the extreme example might be "What do you do if someone comes to > you with a HIG compliant, gtk+ using, accessible, i18n translated 'Bomb > the New York Subway' game" [hello MI5] > > There are things you want a reason never to be associated with.
Or one day we may want to refuse certification from companies that support the other operating system :D. Is the foundation going to certify apps or are companies allowed to evaluate and certify their own apps? If the former, should there be any fee for getting GNOME certified? --behdad http://behdad.org/ _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
