> Then I don't see how Alan's point can be applied. Someone with a > Bomb... game should be free to label "GNOME certified" if it > happens to satisfy the technical aspects. And it should be clear > that it's a self-certificate. Maybe it should not be called a > certificate after all. "GNOME Friendly" may be a better term.
Providing it doesn't in any way imply a connectio then yes I agree. Its about naming. Novell used to have a "works with netware" thing along those lines in fact. Alan _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
