Hi, Selon Jonathan Blandford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > - Software which is license violating > > - Software which otherwise harms the name of GNOME > > - "Software the foundation management believes would harm the reputation > > of GNOME" > > - Software where a referendum of members is called, counts achieved and > > the referendum is passed against certification [ie a last resort] > > what are you thinking of > 'harming the name of GNOME'? Is a clause requiring acceptable levels of > privacy sufficient? Do you have other, concrete concerns here?
The GNOME certification process would be a stamp of approval handed out by us. As such, we would have to be careful that we don't hand out a GNOME stamp of approval to people we don't approve of. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Neary Lyon, France _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
