> > There is indeed lack of context here. You strongly implied that the >> board and the travel-committee was corrupt, which is an opinion that >> you have every right to hold. If you do truly think that this is the >> case, then it is my opinion that you should indeed raise the matter >> with the membership rather than keeping quiet. >> > > Wait a bit. Asking for information means that I imply that board and > travel-committee is corrupt? > If yes, sorry the Board, sorry Travel Committee. I've noticed that I think > both of you are corrupt! > > Come on, Ekaterina. We know that everyone is equal for GNOME Foundation > and we know we had problems about decisions being taken differently for the > same situation and different people. Is it corruption? I don't think so. > What I do think so is that having every detail opened would help people to > understand this kind of situation without have to argue with you and hear > those kind of answers. >
Here is the whole conversation where, according to Ekaterina, I *strongly* imply that the board and the travel committee are corrupt: http://rachacuca.org/~fidencio/friendly_chat.log Best Regards, -- Fabiano Fidêncio
_______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
