On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 09:27 +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: <snip> > With or without a good reason, you took the non-polite way to answer. > Why? I don't know, seriously.
When discussing such matters, you'll want to take out the sarcasm (which you've applied in a few of your answers, it really doesn't help). Furthermore, you've said that "[you] *strongly* imply that the board and the travel committee are corrupt". You better come up with proofs of that before carrying on this conversation. Having been on the board, I can assure you that "preferential treatment" does not equate to corruption. I put preferential treatment in quotes because that's what it might look like from an outside point of view, especially if you've been refused sponsorship for an event. But the fact is that somebody who's been in the community for longer, or that's already delivered higher-level talks about the project's direction, or that's delivered very successful talks is more likely to get sponsorship than a person that doesn't have that history. So, why do you think the travel committee and the Board are corrupt? Did you or a friend of yours get denied sponsorship? Did you ask for the reason for refusal? Cheers _______________________________________________ foundation-list mailing list foundation-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-list
