Additional IPs do not get populated to the BPs and they can not be
used for load balancing if I remember correctly.
FastIrons are a different product with different limits.
R, Oliver
At 01:16 15.11.2008, Stephan van Hienen wrote:
What is exatly happening when i create a new vlan with ve/ip ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config)#vlan 210 name testvlan by port
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vlan-210)# tagged ethe 3 to 4
added tagged port ethe 3 to 4 to port-vlan 210.
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vlan-210)# router-interface ve 61
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vlan-210)#interface ve 61
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61)# port-name "* VLAN210 gateway *"
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61)# ip address 192.168.134.1 255.255.255.248
Error! Maximum number of IP reached 64
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61)# ip vrrp vrid 61
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61-vrid-61)# owner
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61-vrid-61)# ip-address 192.168.134.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED](config-vif-61-vrid-61)# activate
VRRP router 61 for this interface is activating
I receive the error Maximum number of IP reached 64, but It looks
like the vlan/ve are still activated ?
(and I can ping the ip 192.168.134.1 from a remote device)
But still looks like I have to search for a new device (extra maybe)
I can keep the servers which need loadbalancing on the serveriron.
So what about the fastiron (FES12GCF) same limitation ?
Thnx,
Stephan
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
This is a limit on all the ServerIron platforms.
Mischa
Interesting. Is this limit the same on all ServerIrons in the product
line? or just the 4g?
-Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oliver Adam
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:22 AM
To: Mischa Peters; Stephan van Hienen
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [f-nsp] ip (ve) limit on serveriron 4g
Mischa is correct - you can define up to 64 IPs which is a hard
limit. I am sorry for that.
R, Oliver
At 21:21 13.11.2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
> Hi Stephan,
> > The amount of virtual interfaces is also (unfortunately) limited by
> the 64 IP limit.
> This is a combined limit for both source-ips and VEs.
> > Mischa
> > > Hmms didn't think I would hit the serveriron's limit that soon... :(
> > But how is this related to the maximum ammount of virtual-interface
> > then ? (which can be 512)
> > > > So no other options than just buying another pair of foundry's ?
> > (not sure if I need to buy serverirons, since i would be able to
> > move ve's which don't use loadbalancing)
> > > > Thnx,
> > > > Stephan
> > > > > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2008, Mischa Peters wrote:
> > > > > You can not change that limit, that is a hard limit on the BPs of
> > > the ServerIron.
> > > > > > Mischa
> > > > > > > When I tried to create another vlan with ve I got
the following
> > > > message :
> > > > Error! Maximum number of IP reached 64
> > > > In the past I also had a maximum vlan, which I could fix by using
> > > > system-max vlan.
> > > > But I can't find anything about this ip limit in the documentation/
specs.
> > > > Any hints how to fix this ?
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > foundry-nsp mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
> > _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
[email protected]
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
