Thanks for your valuable feedback. SI350 or SI450 w/ WSM6, J-BxG or J-B4Gx and Traffic Works PREM should fullfill my requirement am I right?
Regards, Samit Oliver Adam wrote: > Correct - the limit is a global one. Moving to the bigger Foundry boxes > based on WSM6-2, WSM6 and WSM7 blades you are going to have limits per > processor (5 million per processor) but not per port. > > R, Oliver > > At 17:07 18.11.2008, Mike Allen wrote: >> Samit, yeah, there is no limit per port for the SI. The numbers are >> global, and all are usable whether you use all the ports, or a single >> physical interface. >> >> Mike >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:18 AM, Samit >> <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, Thanks for the datasheet, but whatever concurrent L4 sessions >> mentioned in the datasheet it seems like it is total max session/sec >> capacity of whole box? Is there any per/port max session limit? like >> Alteon has only max session of 21404/interface. >> >> in->100k-sessions-->Port1(L4 switch) Port3 -->traffic-out >> Port2 >> | >> | >> Proxies Farm >> >> Regards, >> Samit >> >> >> >> Oliver Adam wrote: >> > Please find the datasheets of the XL and the 350 attached (actualle the >> > GT-C which is the bundled version of the 350). >> > >> > Regards, >> > Oliver >> > >> > At 15:52 17.11.2008, Samit wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I am using Alteon 180e as a L2 switch for my web traffic >> redirection to >> >> squid cache since last 7 years, without any problem. The specs of >> Alteon >> >> web switch says it can support 24k web sessions/sec. But per >> interface >> >> slb maximum session in the switch is 21504 and total slb max >> session is >> >> 172032, which is not mentioned in the datasheet. >> >> >> >> Currently I have aggregated 30,000 web redirection sessions per/sec >> and >> >> I am managing this sessions by dividing the traffic and sending it >> >> in 3 different ports of 180e. I recently observed that 180e is missing >> >> connection some time and my users are getting 'tcp reset" . I >> believe it >> >> is hitting the box session limit to high no of concurrent sessions per >> >> sec, though the box shows terminated connection occasionally because >> >> while I bypass traffic of few prefixes to decrease the sessions it >> runs >> >> just fine. >> >> >> >> The traffic is rapidly increasing I would just send the traffic for >> >> redirection from just 1 port but unable to do so.... What would be >> the >> >> best alternative to upgrade this switch in terms of price and >> >> performance? >> >> >> >> I required at least 100k sessions/sec inbound L4 web redirection >> session >> >> in one single port. And 3 Gig port is adequate for me. >> >> >> >> Nortel Alteon 3408E is way way too expensive comparatively to >> Alteon180e >> >> which is available in ebay for 300$. Can any Foundry's older >> models can >> >> do it? like "T8SLBF ServerIronXL/G 8 port Gigabit SX, 400Mhz >> processor, >> >> 32MB DRAM, Internet IronWare" , SI 350Any other good suggestions? >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Samit >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> >> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >> >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> _______________________________________________ >> foundry-nsp mailing list >> <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] >> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp >> > > _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
