Well, First of all, one is a switch who can do a little routing with small RIB capacity while the other is a router who can do a little switching whit high RIB capacity.
Again, if you don't state your needs/requirements/sizing, it's going to be difficult to help. Y. Le 29 août 2013 à 00:54, "Eric Louie" <[email protected]> a écrit : > What’s the difference between the CER and the CES? From the local Systems > Engineer, he says “L3 VPNs on the CER, L2 VPNs on the CES”. Any other > notable differences? > > much appreciated, > Eric Louie > > From: Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:45 PM > To: Eric Louie > Cc: foundry-nsp > Subject: Re: [f-nsp] NetIron CER 2000 as a metro switch > > Hello Eric, > > I have been running CER-RT as route reflectors and MPLS PEs for our "small" > POPs just fine. > > Now, if you are looking for metro switchs as a replacement for Cisco ME3600, > you should probably take a look at the CES switchs destined for that typical > use case. > > Again, it all depends on your requirements/needs/sizing which you didn't > specify. > > HTH. > > > > Le 29 août 2013 à 00:31, "Eric Louie" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > I’m considering using the CER 2000 as a mpls PE switch. I have been told > that the CER-RT can also be used as an Internet edge switch (will hold > multiple BGP tables) > > I’m interested in your experiences in configuration and operation in either > application. What are you using for CE devices? (Brocade doesn’t seem to > have a branch office router) > > (Currently using Cisco ME3600-X for PE and c871 for CE) > > much appreciated, > Eric Louie > > _______________________________________________ > foundry-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
_______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list [email protected] http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp
