On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
On 15.09.2015 08:58, Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Ondrej Pokorny wrote:
I've developed a "single/multiple instances" feature for the Lazarus IDE.
For this feature I need an IPC. First I tried to use simpleipc but I have
struggled on bugs and missing functionality.
Particularly what I found:
1.) BUG: You can register multiple servers on Windows with the same name
(with StartServer procedure).
2.) Small issue: simpleipc uses exceptions if something fails (e.g. in
StartServer procedure). I would prefer using a function with boolean
result (true = OK, false = fail).
3.) MISSING: Multiple clients (from different processes) talk to one
server.
4.) MISSING: Client is able to receive a response on a request.
5.) MISSING: (Optionally, not default) client sends a request to a server
that isn't running. The server is able to handle these requests when it is
started.
So I developed "advancedipc.pas" that does what I need. It can do
everything that is in simpleirc but a little bit differently (I changed
the exception behavior and also method names). The question is now what to
do?
1.) Include advancedipc.pas into FCL as a standalone unit.
2.) Make advancedipc.pas backwards compatible to simpleipc.pas and use the
new code in simpleipc.pas.
Well, both 1 and 2 are the way to go if you want it included in FPC :-)
I see no point in including duplicate functionality, it means duplicate
maintenance. You can keep it as separate units, just make sure simpleipc
runs on top of advancedipc.
As for no semaphores on linux: of course there are semaphores, they exist
since many many years, they are part of POSIX: "man sem_overview".
Michael.
Thanks a lot Michael!
I'll prepare it, write (unit) tests and some demo and then send them over!
Thanks also for the semaphore information. I couldn't find anything on the
internet, therefore I thought Lazarus doesn't support them.
Are there some high level crossplatform semaphore functions in the FCL? The
cthreads/cIntSemaphoreOpen etc. seem to be available on unix only. What about
OS/2?
Careful, these are thread semaphores, I think.
I am talking about cross-process semaphores. They are in the baseunix/unix units.
I suppose OS/2 has semaphores, but Tomas will need to confirm.
But if OS/2 currently does not support simpleIPC, then the point is moot anyway.
What about Windows? It looks like semaphores are supported only since XP:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682438(v=vs.85).aspx
. Is this a problem for the FCL? (Basically, semaphores are only needed on
unix due to the file locking. But I am still interested.)
Officially, FPC no longer supports Windows 95. The compiler and most parts of the
RTL will function on Windows 95, so it will do some basic stuff.
For the FCL, I really do not see this as a problem.
If you need advanced IPC such as this, you will no longer be using Windows 95.
We must be practical in such matters.
Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-devel maillist - fpc-devel@lists.freepascal.org
http://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-devel
