Art Campbell wrote: >A little rich, but interesting reading: >http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2007/02/framemaker_is_and_will_remain.html
Twelve years after the first release of Adobe-branded FrameMaker (5.0), and six years after Adobe's "FrameMaker is alive and well" statement, I would like to second the suggestion made by Keith Soltys (Core Dump, http://www.soltys.ca/coredump/labels/FrameMaker.html ): "Start with the easy fixes -- take a look at the 'My Frame Wish and Bug List' on the FrameMaker QuickHelp site and fix the issues raised there. That'd be a really good way of showing us that Adobe is committed to FrameMaker, and its users, who have put up with a lot over the last decade." In my opinion, this equally applies to [FM+SGML>]Structured FrameMaker. Tim Murray's "My Frame Wish and Bug List" is at http://www.techknowledgecorp.com/help/wishlist.html My "FrameMaker Annoyances: Bugs & Issues" (partial) is at http://www.microtype.com/FM_bugs.html Shlomo Perets MicroType, http://www.microtype.com * ToolbarPlus Express for FrameMaker FrameMaker/Acrobat training & consulting * FrameMaker-to-Acrobat TimeSavers/Assistants
