What do you mean by a complete index entry? It doesn't seem to have to match the complete second level portion of the index entry, so I'm not clear.
No matter what I do, space, no space before the [, these still won't sort right under the stud and rollers first level entries. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linda G. Gallagher TechCom Plus, LLC lindag at techcomplus dot com www.techcomplus.com 303-450-9076 or 800-500-3144 User guides, online help, FrameMaker and WebWorks ePublisher templates ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:framers-bounces at lists.frameusers.com] On Behalf Of steve at siliconprairiesoftware.com Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:22 PM To: framers at lists.frameusers.com Subject: Sort order of entries in an index Lester is on the right track... He said this: Try adding a space before the opening square bracket of the sort order: studs:70 mm roller locations [studs:070 mm] studs:90 mm roller locations [studs:090 mm] The spaces don't affect the sorting. The importing thing to note is that the item included in the square brackets must be a complete index entry. Lester's example is a complete entry in the square brackets, so his example should sort correctly. Another common problem with re-sorting is that once Frame encounters the set of square brackets, it stops parsing the entry. That's why you can't have entries that look like this: studs: 70 mm[070 mm]: roller Instead, the re-sorting should appear at the end: studs: 70 mm: roller[studs: 070 mm: roller] Hope this helps. Steve _______________________________________________ You are currently subscribed to Framers as lindag at techcomplus.com. Send list messages to framers at lists.frameusers.com. To unsubscribe send a blank email to framers-unsubscribe at lists.frameusers.com or visit http://lists.frameusers.com/mailman/options/framers/lindag%40techcomplus.com Send administrative questions to listadmin at frameusers.com. Visit http://www.frameusers.com/ for more resources and info.
