On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Do people have opinions on this: > > http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177 > > It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really > useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how > bad the performance overhead would be. > > Daniel, thoughts on this for AT trunk?
Personally I think this plip would be awesome to get in place. But with one small stipulation. I would adding a configlet someplace or some config option somewhere that lets you toggle this behaviour on/off (on a functional level) and have it off by default. That way we don't have to worry about the performance implications by default. Then for Plone 3.5 we could consider having it activated by default. - Rocky -- Rocky Burt ServerZen Software -- http://www.serverzen.com News About The Server (blog) -- http://www.serverzen.net
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
