On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Do people have opinions on this:
http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177
It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really
useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how
bad the performance overhead would be.
Daniel, thoughts on this for AT trunk?
Personally I think this plip would be awesome to get in place. But with
one small stipulation. I would adding a configlet someplace or some
config option somewhere that lets you toggle this behaviour on/off (on a
functional level) and have it off by default. That way we don't have to
worry about the performance implications by default. Then for Plone 3.5
we could consider having it activated by default.
+1, hmm.. instead of field changes, maybe its better to just restructure
the catalog itself, to use real adapters to index content, with a default
implementation respecting this setting. more work, but more flexible for
repurposing on other use cases, probably 3.5 material.
cheers,
kapil
_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
