Kapil Thangavelu wrote: > On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote: >>> Do people have opinions on this: >>> >>> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177 >>> >>> It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really >>> useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how >>> bad the performance overhead would be. >>> >>> Daniel, thoughts on this for AT trunk? >> >> Personally I think this plip would be awesome to get in place. But with >> one small stipulation. I would adding a configlet someplace or some >> config option somewhere that lets you toggle this behaviour on/off (on a >> functional level) and have it off by default. That way we don't have to >> worry about the performance implications by default. Then for Plone 3.5 >> we could consider having it activated by default. > > > +1, hmm.. instead of field changes, maybe its better to just restructure > the catalog itself, to use real adapters to index content, with a > default implementation respecting this setting. more work, but more > flexible for repurposing on other use cases, probably 3.5 material.
Why not include TXNG3? _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
