Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 08:55:07 -0500, Rocky Burt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 2006-11-12 at 13:43 +0000, Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> Do people have opinions on this:
>>>
>>> http://plone.org/products/plone/roadmap/177
>>>
>>> It seems to be a very trivial patch to AT, and it could be really
>>> useful, but I don't know about the implications for installers and how
>>> bad the performance overhead would be.
>>>
>>> Daniel, thoughts on this for AT trunk?
>>
>> Personally I think this plip would be awesome to get in place.  But with
>> one small stipulation.  I would adding a configlet someplace or some
>> config option somewhere that lets you toggle this behaviour on/off (on a
>> functional level) and have it off by default.  That way we don't have to
>> worry about the performance implications by default.  Then for Plone 3.5
>> we could consider having it activated by default.
> 
> 
> +1, hmm.. instead of field changes, maybe its better to just restructure
> the catalog itself, to use real adapters to index content, with a
> default implementation respecting this setting. more work, but more
> flexible for repurposing on other use cases, probably 3.5 material.

Why not include TXNG3?


_______________________________________________
Framework-Team mailing list
Framework-Team@lists.plone.org
http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team

Reply via email to