On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Ross Patterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess what I'm proposing is either an additional documentation effort > or a further clarification or honing of the intention of documentation > efforts associated with PLIPs. Specifically, that some effort to > address community impact should be a part of documentation efforts. > > Just to collect feedback, is your comment that you don't think this > additional intention/focus doesn't bring additional value sufficient to > formally include it in the PLIP process? > No, I think I've understood you wrong and I was talking about a different thing. :S I agree with you on trying to open up the discussion about Plone 4 future features and changes to the community, but don't really understand yet how would you like to integrate that with the PLIP process. Sorry. -- israel
_______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list [email protected] http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
