Generally when I want to get a broader tonal range with 7363 I process it in a 
paper developer like Dektol. I used Sprint paper developer sometimes too. Never 
tried this with reversal though. The film is process to completion so you can’t 
really overdevelop it. For less contrast you could also try a lower 
concentration of developer. 

Chris Gorski

> On Apr 21, 2018, at 01:57, Dominic Angerame <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I use this stock all the time I have it processed as reversal and rate it 
> anywhere between 10 or 12 asa i send processing out to a lab the stock is 
> tricky because it has very few greys if you want to sell any let me know I 
> still film with it contact me off sight for other tips [email protected]
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Isaac Brooks <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> For the D19 treatment/negative I've rated it at a 25 ASA with consistent 
>> results. If you have sealed D19, use it with that film. 
>> 
>> Isaac 
>> 
>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Colin Brant <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Dear Frameworks,
>>> 
>>> I am having trouble finding consensus on how to shoot and process Kodak's 
>>> now discontinued 7363 hi-con stock. I bought a bunch from the last run they 
>>> did (2015 I believe) and am now starting to shoot it. I know that there 
>>> have been threads that address this in the past (one even came up in a 
>>> google search) and that this issue, or similar ones, are touched on in 
>>> books like Kathryn Ramey's textbook -- but even so, I'm still left 
>>> wondering how to rate it, and how to leave it in developer. 
>>> 
>>> My desire: shoot 7363 in daylight, develope in Lomo tank without push/pull 
>>> in D19 as B&W Neg.
>>> 
>>> In the first test I did, it was shot at 6ASA and developed for about 6min 
>>> and this resulted in a mostly overexposed negative. Also, I'm most familiar 
>>> with D19 so am not sure if there might be other equivalent developers 
>>> requiring the same timing that could give me an idea of where to begin. 
>>> 
>>> Any insight y'all may have would be greatly appreciated!
>>> cb
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> FrameWorks mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
>> _______________________________________________
>> FrameWorks mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to