Uau, Thank you for the formulas Chris!
Cheers, Cris 2018-04-26 19:38 GMT-03:00 Chris G <spy...@gmail.com>: > Hey Colin, > > I don’t have any measurement devices and honestly I’ve never kept track of > my development times for this stock since I was told about this > process-to-completion early on. I’ve mostly processed short strands less > than 20’/7m in large paper developing trays as negative under a red safe > light and just watched it until it looked ‘done’. I’ve done a lot of > contact prints under a photo enlarger, bi-packing and shooting > off-the-screen with it, but never as a camera stock. Based on visual > inspection I’ve noticed it to be done when it’s done and will reiterate > that it’s *probably* more about the exposure and developer than the > development time. > > If you’re mixing your own D-19 you could try Dektol/D-72, it’s all the > same chems at different quantities according to my sources: > > D-72 Dektol > > Water at 125F/52C, 750.0 ml > Metol, 3.0 g > Sodium sulfite, 45.0 g > Hydroquinone, 12.0 g > Sodium carbonate, monohydrate, 80.0 g > Potassium bromide, 2.0 g > Water to make 1.0 liter > > D-19 > > Metol, 2.0 g > Sodium sulfite, 90.0 g > Hydroquinone, 8.0 g > Sodium carbonate, monohydrate, 52.5 g (45 g anhydrous) > Potassium bromide, 5.0 g > Water to make 1.0 liter > > I’m slightly skeptical of the order as I’ve been mixing a lot of D-96 > lately and usually mix part of the sodium sulfite in first to prevent > oxidization from either the Calgon and/or Metol (not sure, and full > disclosure that I also failed chemistry all those years ago). > > I have some of this stock, a camera and bleach. If I can I’ll test it out > soon at let you know! > > Cheers, > Chris > > On Apr 25, 2018, at 03:41, Colin Brant <colinsbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank y'all for these responses! > > Seth, that is a great resource to know about, thanks for sending the link! > > Chris, I'm very curious about this idea that 7363 is "process to > completion"! Are you saying that when it is "done" it's done and any extra > time in the developer will not affect density? Just curious because I've > heard of that for Fix but never for developer. The Kodak tech sheet, in > regard to developer time, says "*develope to recommended control gamma*" > which is defined as 2.90 to 3.20. > > Jason, my next tests are going to be at ASA 25... we'll see what happens : > ) > > Thanks again! > Cin cin, > cb > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Jason Halprin <jihalp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Oh, and I seem to recall a friend stating that they rated 7363 as ISO 25, >> and developed in D-19 1:1 for 9 minutes (as neg, spaghetti-bucket) >> >> Jason Halprin >> jihalp...@gmail.com >> jasonhalprin.com <jihalp...@gmail.com> >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Jason Halprin <jihalp...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, I shoot 7363 rated at ISO 6, and develop as neg in >>> Dektol 4:1 for 90 sec (spaghetti-bucket method). >>> >>> -JH >>> >>> Jason Halprin >>> jihalp...@gmail.com >>> jasonhalprin.com <jihalp...@gmail.com> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Chris G <spy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Generally when I want to get a broader tonal range with 7363 I process >>>> it in a paper developer like Dektol. I used Sprint paper developer >>>> sometimes too. Never tried this with reversal though. The film is process >>>> to completion so you can’t really overdevelop it. For less contrast you >>>> could also try a lower concentration of developer. >>>> >>>> Chris Gorski >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 01:57, Dominic Angerame <dominic.anger...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I use this stock all the time I have it processed as reversal and rate >>>> it anywhere between 10 or 12 asa i send processing out to a lab the stock >>>> is tricky because it has very few greys if you want to sell any let me know >>>> I still film with it contact me off sight for other tips >>>> domi...@cinemod.net >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Isaac Brooks <isaacbrook...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> For the D19 treatment/negative I've rated it at a 25 ASA with >>>> consistent results. If you have sealed D19, use it with that film. >>>> >>>> Isaac >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Colin Brant <colinsbr...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Frameworks, >>>>> >>>>> I am having trouble finding consensus on how to shoot and process >>>>> Kodak's now discontinued 7363 hi-con stock. I bought a bunch from the last >>>>> run they did (2015 I believe) and am now starting to shoot it. I know that >>>>> there have been threads that address this in the past (one even came up in >>>>> a google search) and that this issue, or similar ones, are touched on in >>>>> books like Kathryn Ramey's textbook -- but even so, I'm still left >>>>> wondering how to rate it, and how to leave it in developer. >>>>> >>>>> My desire: shoot 7363 in daylight, develope in Lomo tank without >>>>> push/pull in D19 as B&W Neg. >>>>> >>>>> In the first test I did, it was shot at 6ASA and developed for about >>>>> 6min and this resulted in a mostly overexposed negative. Also, I'm most >>>>> familiar with D19 so am not sure if there might be other equivalent >>>>> developers requiring the same timing that could give me an idea of where >>>>> to >>>>> begin. >>>>> >>>>> Any insight y'all may have would be greatly appreciated! >>>>> cb >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
