Correction to my post I shoot 7373 and 7378 and not 7363. The information I posted was for those two stocks and NOT 7363. I have never had good luck shooting with that material. My misread of the post.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Colin Brant <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank y'all for these responses! > > Seth, that is a great resource to know about, thanks for sending the link! > > Chris, I'm very curious about this idea that 7363 is "process to > completion"! Are you saying that when it is "done" it's done and any extra > time in the developer will not affect density? Just curious because I've > heard of that for Fix but never for developer. The Kodak tech sheet, in > regard to developer time, says "*develope to recommended control gamma*" > which is defined as 2.90 to 3.20. > > Jason, my next tests are going to be at ASA 25... we'll see what happens : > ) > > Thanks again! > Cin cin, > cb > > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:55 PM, Jason Halprin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Oh, and I seem to recall a friend stating that they rated 7363 as ISO 25, >> and developed in D-19 1:1 for 9 minutes (as neg, spaghetti-bucket) >> >> Jason Halprin >> [email protected] >> jasonhalprin.com <[email protected]> >> >> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 11:54 PM, Jason Halprin <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> For what it's worth, I shoot 7363 rated at ISO 6, and develop as neg in >>> Dektol 4:1 for 90 sec (spaghetti-bucket method). >>> >>> -JH >>> >>> Jason Halprin >>> [email protected] >>> jasonhalprin.com <[email protected]> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Chris G <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Generally when I want to get a broader tonal range with 7363 I process >>>> it in a paper developer like Dektol. I used Sprint paper developer >>>> sometimes too. Never tried this with reversal though. The film is process >>>> to completion so you can’t really overdevelop it. For less contrast you >>>> could also try a lower concentration of developer. >>>> >>>> Chris Gorski >>>> >>>> On Apr 21, 2018, at 01:57, Dominic Angerame <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I use this stock all the time I have it processed as reversal and rate >>>> it anywhere between 10 or 12 asa i send processing out to a lab the stock >>>> is tricky because it has very few greys if you want to sell any let me know >>>> I still film with it contact me off sight for other tips >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Apr 20, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Isaac Brooks <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> For the D19 treatment/negative I've rated it at a 25 ASA with >>>> consistent results. If you have sealed D19, use it with that film. >>>> >>>> Isaac >>>> >>>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:30 PM Colin Brant <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear Frameworks, >>>>> >>>>> I am having trouble finding consensus on how to shoot and process >>>>> Kodak's now discontinued 7363 hi-con stock. I bought a bunch from the last >>>>> run they did (2015 I believe) and am now starting to shoot it. I know that >>>>> there have been threads that address this in the past (one even came up in >>>>> a google search) and that this issue, or similar ones, are touched on in >>>>> books like Kathryn Ramey's textbook -- but even so, I'm still left >>>>> wondering how to rate it, and how to leave it in developer. >>>>> >>>>> My desire: shoot 7363 in daylight, develope in Lomo tank without >>>>> push/pull in D19 as B&W Neg. >>>>> >>>>> In the first test I did, it was shot at 6ASA and developed for about >>>>> 6min and this resulted in a mostly overexposed negative. Also, I'm most >>>>> familiar with D19 so am not sure if there might be other equivalent >>>>> developers requiring the same timing that could give me an idea of where >>>>> to >>>>> begin. >>>>> >>>>> Any insight y'all may have would be greatly appreciated! >>>>> cb >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> FrameWorks mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> FrameWorks mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
