On Friday 03 September 2010 03:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Friday 03 September 2010 02:31 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > on 03/09/2010 06:01 Ian Smith said the following: > > > But that's really an aside from the real issue you identify > > > below, and perhaps also some TZ value/s being 'absurd' .. > > > > Let's try to not mix these things together just yet. > > acpi_hp/acpi_wmi problems should not affect acpi_ec in any way. > > (the converse could be true, but let's not go there yet...) > > Uh... If I am reading acpi_wmi.c correctly, it installs its own > version of EC handler and EC is directly read/written via > ACPI_EC_READ() and ACPI_EC_WRITE() from there. Apparently, it just > bypasses EC serialization and "affects" EC. Am I reading it wrong?
Please ignore what I just said. It is not attached properly, so it doesn't affect EC at all. Doh... Sorry for the noise. Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
