Hello, on Tuesday 29 May 2012 at 18:18, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Do you see the same behavior? Would you have any idea on how to diagnose > > whatever could be wrong? > > Have you applied the kernel patches?
Yes, I think so, that's what I meant when I wrote: > On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Natacha Porté <[email protected]> wrote: > > More specifically, I checked out 9-STABLE, and merged all 14 commits > > listed at the end of http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU More specifically, here is the sequence of commands I used, extracted from my shell history: mkdir STABLE cd STABLE svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/stable/9 cd 9/sys svn merge -c 235356,235359,235362,235365,235366,235372,235375,235776,235782,235783,235846,235847,235859,235925 svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head/sys cd .. vim sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c # adding "LEN0068" make buildworld buildkernel make installworld installkernel mergemaster -FUi shutdown -r now The list of revisions to merge is taken directly from http://wiki.freebsd.org/Intel_GPU where the patch used to be. There was only one reported merge conflict, caused by a line a context from CURRENT that didn't exist in STABLE, but since it was only adding declaration lines, it was trivially solved. Now maybe I'm missing some code, maybe I made a mistake copying the revision numbers (I've only checked them 3 times, but found no mismatch), maybe the wiki page is wrong. That's why I'm publicly asking for help, at least for diagnosis. Or maybe I made no mistake and intel integrated GPU is just that bad (though performance in Windows does not really hint that way). Thanks for your help, Natacha _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
