On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 19:01 +0100, Liam J. Foy wrote: > > The same reviewer did a review of OpenBSD a couple of articles previously: > > > > http://os.newsforge.com/os/05/05/20/1426216.shtml?tid=8 > > > > On the whole his experience looked worse than with FreeBSD, but the tone > > of the OBSD article was more favorable. Anyone else notice this? > > > > Jem Matzan just seems to be anti-FreeBSD. > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com > > Jon Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > Jem Matzan is known for poor reviews throughout *BSD. >
Ah yes, thejemreport.com, not egotistical at all... Hang on, isn't his 5.4 review nothing more than a slight rewording of the 5.3 review??? This could turn out as character assassination as well as OS assassination. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Achean Ltd http://www.achean.com Jon Mercer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"