At 3:33 PM +0200 1999/9/17, Brad Knowles wrote:
> For the third and final stage (20,000 files and 100,000
> operations), I get the following results:
>
> Transactions per second: 38
> KBytes Read per second: 102.84
> KBytes Written per second: 142.15
Running the first test again on a much more powerful system (Dell
PowerEdge 1300 Pentium III @ 450Mhz w/ 1MB L2 cache and 1GB RAM,
running Linux 2.9, and on the internal Quantum Viking-II hard drive
mounted "defaults" (including async) on /var), I get:
Transactions per second: 2380
MBytes Read per second: 7.31
MBytes Written per second: 7.47
This is on par with the kind of performance I'd expect to see on
a similar machine running FreeBSD 3.x-STABLE and softupdates, but I
don't know how it compares to -STABLE and standard Berkeley FFS.
I'm running the second tests now.
--
These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy
____________________________________________________________________
|o| Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o|
|o| Systems Architect, News & FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o|
|o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o|
|o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o|
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside.
Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
