>phk> > Since newconfig appears technically superior, what are the issues
>that
>phk> >are hindering its acceptance?
>phk>
>phk> That we want to have no "config" at all.
>
>That is too short an answer.
No, it is complete and to the point.
>What is the definition of "config"?
config(8)
>Why do you want to remove it?
Why should we, as a 3rd millenium OS need a static config tool ?
Tell me which future technology we will need to handle which will
require static config ?
We are working on FreeBSD as a OS for the future, not for the past.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
[email protected] "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
