In message <53d395e4.1070...@fastmail.net>, Darren Reed writes: > On 24/07/2014 1:42 AM, Cy Schubert wrote: > >>> > >>> But, lack of ipv6 fragment processing still causes ongoing pain. That'= > >>> s our=20 > >>> #1 wish list item for the cluster. > > Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a > > little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn't > > support it for sure. I've been told that ipfw may and I suspect ipfilter > > doesn't as it was on Darren's todo list from 2009. > > ipfiler 5 handles fragments for ipv6.
Switching gears and leaving the discussion of ipv6 fragments to mention nat66. A lot of people have been talking about nat66. I could be wrong but I don't think it can handle nat66. I need to do some testing to verify this. I remember reading on sourceforge that it was on your todo list. It doesn't look like it was checked off as being completed. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@komquats.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
