In message <53d395e4.1070...@fastmail.net>, Darren Reed writes:
> On 24/07/2014 1:42 AM, Cy Schubert wrote:
> >>> But, lack of ipv6 fragment processing still causes ongoing pain. That'=
> >>> s our=20
> >>> #1 wish list item for the cluster.
> > Taking this discussion slightly sideways but touching on this thread a
> > little, each of our packet filters will need nat66 support too. Pf doesn't
> > support it for sure. I've been told that ipfw may and I suspect ipfilter
> > doesn't as it was on Darren's todo list from 2009.
> ipfiler 5 handles fragments for ipv6.
Switching gears and leaving the discussion of ipv6 fragments to mention
nat66. A lot of people have been talking about nat66. I could be wrong but
I don't think it can handle nat66. I need to do some testing to verify
this. I remember reading on sourceforge that it was on your todo list. It
doesn't look like it was checked off as being completed.
Cy Schubert <cy.schub...@komquats.com>
FreeBSD UNIX: <c...@freebsd.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org
The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"