On 29/07/2014 8:07 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: ... > And all IPv6 NAT is evil and should be cast into (demonic residence > of your choosing) on sight!
For the most part, I agree with you but the problem is "checkbox" comparisons. That IPv6 shouldn't be NAT'd is why I didn't implement it for such a long time. However given the problem that EIDs pose for privacy, I'm of the opinion that maybe NAT66 does have a place but not in the way that the NAT66 RFC prescribes. Darren _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"