On 29/07/2014 8:07 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> And all IPv6 NAT is evil and should be cast into (demonic residence
> of your choosing) on sight!

For the most part, I agree with you but the problem is "checkbox"
comparisons. That IPv6 shouldn't be NAT'd is why I didn't implement
it for such a long time.

However given the problem that EIDs pose for privacy, I'm of the
opinion that maybe NAT66 does have a place but not in the way that
the NAT66 RFC prescribes.


freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to