>So, who wants to do a proof-of-concept implementation for -current
>which integrates with our existing rc.conf mechanism? In order to
>obey POLA, we should at least have the separate scripts switch off the
>same knobs whenever possible.
>
>It's something I'd be willing to do, I guess. I have some history
>with the rc.foo files. :)
I'm rather new to -current, but I'd be willing to be junior hacker on this
project. I'm rather fond of shell script hacking and other languages come
easily to me too.
DocWilco
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Mike Meyer
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.fire... Gerhard Sittig
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Jordan Hubbard
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Nik Clayton
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Warner Losh
- RE: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Rogier R. Mulhuijzen
- RE: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 Andrea Campi
- Re: new rc.network6 and rc.firewall6 David O'Brien
