On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 11:44:36PM -0700, Nate Williams wrote:
> Ahh, if we're limiting the discussio to 'OS vendor' software, then every
> OS vendor I know installs its software in /usr/bin, and /usr/lib.
David hands Nate a freshly minted copy of BSD/OS 4.2, where he will see
/usr/contrib/ burned on the CDROM (using an electron microscope of
course :-)).
> Even Sun does this with it's 'OS vendor' tools.
Uhm.. not everything. Many optional pieces from Sun installs in /opt.
The SunPro compiler suite for instance is just one example. One must add
/opt/SUNWspro/bin to their path if they want to run it.
> So, going with the 'OS vendor' argument, then all software should
> install itself in /usr, and definitely not /usr/local.
Sun shows otherwise.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/l... Mike Meyer
- Re: Applix problems (Was: /usr/l... David O'Brien
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... Warner Losh
- /usr/local abuse Mike Meyer
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: /usr/local abuse David O'Brien
- Re: /usr/local abuse Nate Williams
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... Wes Peters
- Re: Confusing error messages from sh... Warner Losh
- Re: Confusing error messages fro... David O'Brien
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell i... Garrett Wollman
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activation Tony Maher
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image activat... Richard J Kuhns
- Re: Confusing error messages from shell image act... David O'Brien
