"Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I fully agree. wctype.h and isw*() must be implemented first instead of
> hacking or using private interface (like runes) in userland program.
> It will be easy to implement them over existen ctype mechanism masking
> runes with wchar_t. Any takers?

If we're not going to bring in CITRUS, I'd prefer to see runes junked
as an unnecessary layer of abstraction.  Doing so would break
backwards compatibility for locales, but I think we're going to end up
doing that eventually anyway.
I've always wanted to be a dilettante, but I've never quite been ready
to make the commitment.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to