"Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote:
> Warner Losh([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 12:40:18AM -0700:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> > : > Play the ball, not the man.
> > :
> > : I don't have an objection to the change, I was just asking.  And
> > : "because System V does it this way" has never been a good answer for
> > : us.  And no, I'm not picking on Doug, just making a point.
> >
> > I see no reason why the name can't remain portmap.
> >
> does it take parameters?
> then it would make sense to have it named rpcbind...

        Pardon me being dense, but what does that have to do with anything?
portmap took a -v flag, or are you talking about something different? 

    Perhaps the greatest damage the American system of education has done
    to its children is to teach them that their opinions are relevant
    simply because they are their opinions.

        Do YOU Yahoo!?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to