I got the same results as you. It eventually worked when I copied
the entry matching my card into /etc/pccard.conf and hard-wired the
irq as the same as the pcic device (9 in my case):
$ cat /etc/pccard.conf
card "Lucent Technologies" "WaveLAN/IEEE"
config auto "wi" 9
insert /etc/pccard_ether $device start
remove /etc/pccard_ether $device stop
With a ? instead of the 9 on the config line, I got an irq resource
allocation failure. Go figure !
> So the question remains..
> where was I supposed to change the interrupt mentionned in the
> UPDATING entry..
> if not in the pccard.conf, then where?
> I certainly get the 'hangs' mentionned as being a symptom
> of NOT doing it..
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 11:19:10AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > kernel: pcic1: <TI PCI-1225 PCI-CardBus Bridge> irq 11 at device 4.1 on pci0
> > >
> > > > in pccard.conf I had
> > > >
> > > > irq 11
> > > >
> > > > is this not what I was supposed to do?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I guess maybe this directive is counter-intuative. It supposed to
> > > be a list of the free irq's in the system for pccardd to use with
> > > inserted pccards when configuring them. Trying to use the irq that the
> > > cardbus bridge already has will definetly result in a resource
> > > allocation failure.
> > Er, well, it shouldn't, and more to the point, in most modern laptops you
> > *have* to share the two.
> > --
> > ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
> > rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want
> > to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
> > people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt]
> > V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E
Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <brian@[uk.]FreeBSD.org>
Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour !
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message