In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, BSD User wrote:
>Actually, upon instrumenting some code, it looks like RELEASE-4.4 gets it
>mostly right.  It ejects a PROG_UNAVAIL call which causes the Solaris 8
>client to back off.  The correct message would seem to be PROC_UNAVAIL,
>but I would take PROG_UNAVAIL if I could get -current to eject it.

In this case ( the NFS_ACL one) it seems PROG_UNAVAIL is the right thing.
It has a different program number from NFS and it is not just a not implemented
procedure that is part of NFS.


Paul van der Zwan               paulz @
"I think I'll move to theory, everything works in theory..."

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to