Could someone tell me where documentation concerning the use of perforce and or, how to gain access to is located?
Up until very recently I was not aware of it's existence. This would make it very difficult for someone new to the Project to contribute. It seems to my line of thinking that the existence of a repository That is undocumented, that is used for major development proccess's Breaks our development model. Further enhancing the "Elite" attitude that is so often proscribed To BSD* developers. Robert Garrett -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jochem Kossen Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 4:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Patch to improve mutex collision performance On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, if all developers started using p4, things would be easier and work > > better in the long term. p4 is lightyears ahead of cvs, and, from what > > I've read in this thread, developers are not exactly happy with cvs now, > > as it's limitations have become evident. > > Perforce also has limitations. It does a number of things better than > CVS, and a number of things worse. Its main problem, IMHO, is that it > tries to do too much, at the expense of basic functionality. As it seems people are forming a list of cvs alternatives, anyone ever took a look at arch? http://regexps.com/#arch A buddy of mine just mentioned it, and it seemed to fit in this discussion, i don't know it myself though. It's covered under the GPL. Jochem To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message