On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 10:49:18 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> This is definitly something that is needed..
> The question is whether the CAM and ATAPI authors feel it is
> right. We are guided by them (even though we desperatly need this).
> Personally even if not perfect.. it's better than nothing and we should
> probably commit something like it. or based on it..
> (having looked at it I think it seems fine.)
I think it's a good idea as well.
> So here's my vote for a quick commit.
No. See below. There are still problems with it.
It probably also needs to be reviewed before it goes in.
But yes, it is a good idea.
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Thomas Quinot wrote:
> > An updated version of the ATAPI/CAM patches is available from
> > http://www.cuivre.fr.eu.org/~thomas/atapicam/
> > This version contains no functional changes, but synchronize with
> > recent modifications to the generic ATAPI code.
> > As always, I would be interested in any feedback. Specifically, there
> > is one known pending issue with this code: on *some* machines,
> > patched kernels hang at boot time, immediately after registering
> > the new CAM sim. If it hangs on your machine and you can provide
> > a backtrace of the point where the freeze occurs, it would be most
> > helpful.
> > Enjoy,
> > Thomas.
> > --
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message