It seems Scott Long wrote:
> > As I have stated several times, I have no problem with ATAPI being
> > sent through CAM as long as the usual way stays (some of us cannot
> > afford the weight of those extra layers, nor loose functionality).
> > I'd do the integration somewhat differently to even further minimise 
> > the diffs, but that is really not the issue here...
> > So if we can get *serious* commitment from a committer to take up
> > these loose ends, lets talk about what to do, if not my offer stands :)
> I'll raise my hand here.  I've been keenly interested in this for a
> while, since it will make my UDF work much simpler.  I'm also getting my

Hmm, your UDF code should know nothing about the lower layers, but 
we've been over that already :)

> feet wet in CAM, and I have the two CAM gurus nearby if things get too
> hairy.  I fully indend for this to be a cooperative effort with Thomas;
> I'm mainly raising my hand to take the abuse that will no doubt happen
> once in a while.

Sure, maybe we should make Thomas a committer so he could look after
it himself ? Interested ? Got the time ? I'm all ears for volounteers...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Reply via email to