On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 19:38, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 7:27 PM -0600 7/16/02, Eric Anholt wrote: > >It notably doesn't include md5summing of Wraphelp.c. If I can > >find what's the 'best' Wraphelp.c (and most legal? What's the > >status of wraphelp importing/exporting?), I'll switch it. Is > >there any circumstance when someone wouldn't have access to > >Wraphelp.c? > > I thought the whole point of Wraphelp.c was that the person who > runs the machine (whatever machine X is being installed on) has > to obtain that file, so they would have to explicitly verify that > they -- personally -- have the right to use it. > > Mind you, I did that once about seven years ago, and I just keep > copying that Wraphelp.c around to wherever I need it. I have no > idea what the current requirement is... :-)
It used to be that way. Then within the last year (iirc) our ports changed to auto-downloading Wraphelp.c and defaulting to HasXdmAuth YES. I don't know what exactly changed legally. I noted that at least NetBSD has a Wraphelp.c in their CVS repos of X-3 and X-4. My changes do make the file required by all of the miniports that could use it, though it only gets used if HasXdmAuth is set to YES by imake-4 (it's default). -- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
