On Saturday, 5 October 2002 at 15:55:05 +0300, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 12:45:59PM -0700, Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Well, the showstopper is in vinum. The fact that ccd(4) works >>> seamlessly with GEOM is testament to this. >> >> For some reason I was under the (mis?)impression that ccd was no longer >> being maintained... If it works with geom, we can probably move our >> machines over to ccd. They're all no-frills stripes, so ccd >> functionality is good enough. > > Some time ago Scott Long pointed out to me that ccd has less > overhead than vinum
It does? > and is better suited for bare striping. It is? I'd be interested in details. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
