On 5/2/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Victor Engmark > On 5/2/07, Ted Mittelstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The computer in the LCD panel takes the video input at a range of refresh > > rates, and converts it to a bitmapped image that is fed to the display > > crystals. You can use whatever horizontal and vertical refresh rates > > you want, as long as they are in the table that the LCD panel's computer > > can decode, the resulting output is the same. > > Even though LCD displays don't flicker, it's useful to set the refresh as > high as the panel is able to display, to get smooth transitions. Try different rates, I think you will find that once you get above 70 Hz you won't be able to see any difference.
But then my card / screen may be fried. And the human eye cannot see distinct pictures at refresh rates beyond about
30-40 frames per second. You may see flicker, but the human eye cannot even distinguish that, much beyond 65-70Hz.
http://www.100fps.com/how_many_frames_can_humans_see.htm - Interesting reading in that respect. Screens still have a long way to go. The rest of the mail looks like trolling, so I'll just leave those parts alone. I only need one of the following three: - Reference documentation where the capabilities of my screen is explained. - A working method for finding this information on my own. - A good explanation for why I should ignore the X.org warnings. -- Victor Engmark Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur - What is said in Latin, sounds profound _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"