On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Peter Boosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Novembre wrote: > > > > Anyhow, smbd was looking for libgnutls.so.13 which I don't have, but I > > do have a libgnutls.so.26 and libgnutls.so in /usr/local/lib/ (the > > latter is a symlink to the former). Also, libgnutls.so.15 exists in > > /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/. So what I did was creating a symlink to > > libgnutls.so.26 and called it libgnutls.so.13, and after rebooting, > > smbd starts just fine. I don't know whether I'm allowed to do such a > > thing or not, but since I didn't get any error message while upgrading > > samba, I don't know what could have gone wrong... > > > > Any ideas? :) > > > > You probably missed this one (from UPDATING): > > 20080303: > AFFECTS: users of security/gnutls and any port that depends on it > AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > gnutls has been updated to 2.2.2 and all shared libraries' versions > have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that > depend on gnutls. Do something like: > > portupgrade -rf gnutls > > Peter > > -- > http://www.boosten.org >
I did a " portupgrade -rf gnutls " and it compiled a lot of the ports and finally fixed the problem. However, I'm wondering why the release notes suggest doing a " portupgrade -faP " if it's not going to upgrade the installed ports in the correct way? Thanks anyway :) _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"