On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:44:10 +0200, Polytropon <free...@edvax.de> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 20:28:55 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas 
> <keram...@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote:
>> I think this is a reasonable approach to the problem of which
>> installation mode to launch.  The default is `user friendly', [...]
> No, the default is GUI. That's a big difference because it entirely
> depends on the user. Imagine a bline user.  Is GUI user friendly for
> him? No, because he has zero output on his Braille line. The installer
> does something and he doesn't even notice.
>       You have 30 seconds to make a selection. If no selection
>       is made, the text mode installer (fail-safe mode) will
>       be launched.

This is a reasonable choice too.  I wasn't very clear but I tend to
favor text mode installations.  This is also why I used quotes around
`user friendly'.

My main point was that if there *is* a GUI installer, it should only
_one_ of the options, and text-mode installation should remain with us
for all users who want it (including me).

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to