On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Gary Kline<kl...@thought.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:24:29PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Gary Kline<kl...@thought.org> wrote: >> > >> > hi glenn, >> >> One 'n'. :) >> > > gotcha! and see, this is a case of my occasionally typing > 1 > key. in vim, typing 'uu' can cause a truckload of code or whatever to > vanish. ... >
Agreed. :) >> > > [ ... ] >> > use mutt is that my fingers know vi. unfortunately, there're too >> >> I use mutt because "it sucks less", quoting the author. > > > be nice if there were a quasi-gui version of mutt.... > > Interesting idea.... >> >> > many things in email now that require a gui reader. be nice to >> > be able to read in evo and if i had to reply, use gvim. >> > >> >> Hmm.... Well, for what it's worth, I didn't even know *vi* had an >> 'undo' option. I thought that was what 'q!' was for. :) >> > > that's almost funny; i have had to use "q!" all to often if i > forget and use vim. it does indeed have some nice features. > but if you have to reply using a gui mailer and your typing isn't > flawlwss, it's keyboard <-> mouse. > I've found that 'q!' is now muscle-memory to me. When I'm actually in front of a GUI, the Gmail/Firefox spellcheck tends to find most of my typographical mistakes, though unfortunately, not my logic mistakes. :) -- Glen Barber _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
