NAGY Andreas wrote: >Okay, that was the main reason for using NFS 4.1. >Is it planned to implement it, or is the focus on pNFS? I took a quick look and implementing this for some cases will be pretty easy. Binding a FORE channel is implied, so for that case all the server does is reply OK to the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION.
To know if the ESXi client case is a simple one, I need to see what the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION arguments look like. If you can capture packets for when this second connection is done and email it to me as an attachment, I can look at what the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION args are. # tcpdump -s 0 -w <file.pcap> host <client-host-for-this-connection> run on the FreeBSD server should get the <file.pcap> I need. Alternately, if you have wireshark handy, you can just use it to look for the BIND_CONN_TO_SESSION request and see if it specifies (FORE, BACK, FORE_OR_BOTH or BACK_OR_BOTH) in it. FORE or FORE_OR_BOTH means it is easy to do and I can probably have a patch for testing in a day or two. rick _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"