> On Nov 8, 2014, at 9:57 AM, Peter Grehan <gre...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Fusion 7 doesn't have this issue so there's always the upgrade option :)
Good to know. >> Ok. If we don't depend on PAT-related exits, then I definitely would >> appreciate preserving the -stable behaviour. Maybe we should not check >> for the PAT-related exists in the first place? I mean if we don't need >> them or depend on them to be there at all... > > bhyve does depend on h/w save/restore of the PAT MSR, and this is the case > for all bare metal that is supported. > > For the nested case, bhyve used to trap/emulate PAT MSR accesses and not > propagate them to the host. I'll look at resurrecting that code. That would be great. As I said: stable/10 works just fine, BTW: Can you review the attached patch that moves disk support from bhyveload and bhyve into a new library called libvdsk. Once there, I plan to add support for VM image formats like vmdk, vhd, qcow, etc. For now, it's just moving the barebones support into the libary. Thanks, -- Marcel Moolenaar mar...@xcllnt.net
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"